 | | Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
|
|
Hi Christian, (...) if you have an endianness problem it should be visible. The easiest would be to compare it with a little-endian machine. (...) It uses the SAM-BA protocol, which is rather simple and without error checking, more like what a human (...) (17 years ago, 28-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: RotateMotor is stuck/nxc
|
|
(...) Elizabeth, Could you upgrade to b31 of NXC and see if you still have this problem? You will need to update your TextOut call to put the "false" as the last parameter or leave it out altogether. TextOut(0, LCD_LINE2, "DONE ROTATE"); Also, could (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | RE: RotateMotor is stuck/nxc
|
|
Just to clarify more although it probably is very clear to most... LEGS_TURNING_DEG = some int to indicate the turning degree MOVENOW & DONE contains different integer values --E -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | RotateMotor is stuck/nxc
|
|
Symptom: Stuck in RotateMotor function call. ===...=== Synopsis of how to create the problem : - 2 tasks - Task1 handles motor A & C - Task2 handles motor B - Task1’s motor movements have to synchronize with the Task2’s motor B movement - Mutex is (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
|
|
(...) ReHi Jürgen, yes this is a trivial job, but what should I learn from this packets ? fwflash returns no error back to commandline ... Does this mean fwflash works blindly and returns no protocol or packet errors ? Why is the result "success" (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
