|
|
 | | Re: events /nxt vs. events/rcx
|
| (...) Sigh... "good luck"? I don't mean to sound too negative, but this is a hard nut to crack under the standard FW I think... at least I've yet to figure out a way to do it to my satisfaction. In fact, more than almost any other single point, this (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| | | | | events /nxt vs. events/rcx
|
| Hi, I tried to write some code to simulate the events like in RCX. It starts to look cluttered. I understand that NXT VM does not support events like you find in the RCX. Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated! Elizabeth (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| | | | | documentation on bt / nxc
|
| I have two bots set up some meaningful ack and nack conversation. However, when one bot/slave lost connection, e.g. terminated abruptly, the sender (master) does not notice that it indeed lost it. The ReceiveRemoteNumber(INBOX, true, ack) does not (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| | | | | name your nxt
|
| Hi, SetBrickDataName(str) seems to be able to only change the name of the nxt temporarily. Once the nxt is started, it loses the name assigned thru the SetBrickDataName earlier. Idea? --Elizabeth (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| | | | | Re: Moving NXT motors by hand
|
| (...) Well, if by "more qualified" you mean "have abused their hardware harder than average, yes :-). Since day 1 I've back-driven the NXT motors by hand, including the magic motor demo (not as efficient with the NXT motors, but it does work), using (...) (18 years ago, 29-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
|
