Subject:
|
Re: Battery Charging Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Apr 2000 03:42:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1227 times
|
| |
| |
Thanks for the tip. I think you are right. I got a NiMH catalogue from
Panasonic and it makes some of the same recommendation such as charge rate,
etc. It is much like NiCD if you charge the battery "watching the clock".
I am planning on building a charger myself using the charger chip from
MAXIM. The MAX712/MAX713 looks very easy to use.... :-p It does all the
voltage drop detection and stuff... If I get it to work, I'll let you know.
(or if you guys really don't care about such things????)
--
Ray
Dennis Clark <dlc@verinet.com> wrote in message
news:Fs7vHr.JFF@lugnet.com...
>
> It is basically charged the same way and has all of the faults of he NiCd
> (voltage depression, etc.) but while it has a higher average capacity, it does
> not have as much current delivery (higher internal resistance.) The cells peak
> charge in a similar manner, but the delta drop-off when charged is less
> obvious. I don't know much about these cells beyond that. I suppose I will
> need to read up on them soon...
>
> I recommend, again, a good peak charger for best battery health. Two chargers
> I know will deal with them, the Novak Millenium and (I think) the Tekin BC112.
> Neither of these are cheap though (>$100). Others may have lower cost ones,
> but I don't know them.
>
> have fun,
> DLC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Battery Charging Question
|
| (...) It is basically charged the same way and has all of the faults of he NiCd (voltage depression, etc.) but while it has a higher average capacity, it does not have as much current delivery (higher internal resistance.) The cells peak charge in a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|