Subject:
|
RE: Motor control
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Mar 1996 22:17:00 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Jules G. Petit <petitj@n-link.IHATESPAMcom>
|
Viewed:
|
2022 times
|
| |
|
|
I would rather have use of the 0 to 8 range because many of the values
in the 0 to 100 range simply fall into groups which give only 9 speeds.
However, I do not support rewriting the IC code. Tom's suggestion,
motor(1,value*14), is simple and meets that need.
Jules
----------
From: Tom Cicatelli[SMTP:cica@tiac.net]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 1996 1:05 PM
To: tgb@bnr.com
Cc: fred martin; handy board listserver
Subject: Re: Motor control
It would make more sense to just use motor(1,speed*14)
This would give you the following:
Value --> Speed
0 --> 0
1 --> 14
2 --> 28
3 --> 42
4 --> 56
5 --> 70
6 --> 84
7 --> 98
I wouldn't bother rewriting the routine.
Tom
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
