Subject:
|
Re: Sonar problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 05:49:24 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Adam <adam@SPAMLESSring.zenox.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1435 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Apr 1997, Sriram Tirunellayi wrote:
> >
> Hi all,
> i just tested my polaroid sonar and it works great. Thanks to
> Kent and Adam. BTW..with the BINH, iwas getting 1"...but when i removed
> it as suggested by Chuck Manis (in some old mail)...it's reading the
> correct distances. So i guess the internal blanking interval of 2.38ms
> is sufficient to detect obstacles and surfaces at distances above 17".
> Any suggestions for innovative mounting of the transducers??
> Thanks
> Sriram
You're more than welcome. As for mounting:
I have found that custom cutting stainless steel brackets with a dremel
tool to be most effective. Sturdy but flexible for purposes of fine
adjustment. Basically it's a long tab that slides through both slots of
the xducer with a wide portion to stop the xducer from slipping off one
end and then bending the tab at the other end. I'm going to try and post a
picture of by bot asap.
-
| | <---- slide thru both slots of xducer then bend tab.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
--- ---
| |
| + + |
| |
---------
>
> P.S Keith when u ftped the files were they in BINARY format ? i cant
> think of any other reason...
>
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sonar problems
|
| (...) Hi all, i just tested my polaroid sonar and it works great. Thanks to Kent and Adam. BTW..with the BINH, iwas getting 1"...but when i removed it as suggested by Chuck Manis (in some old mail)...it's reading the correct distances. So i guess (...) (27 years ago, 5-Apr-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
