 | | Re: Re[2]: phone cord length —Fred G. Martin
| | | | (...) No, that is wrong; the RS232 is converted to TTL at the serial interface board, so you do have TTL on the phone cord. In any event, I would guess that 50 ft. would not be a problem; we're talking about 9600 baud here which is pretty slow. BTW, (...) (28 years ago, 4-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Re[2]: phone cord length —Alan Matthews
| | | | | Sorry Fred, but I must respectfully disagree..... Fred G. Martin wrote: (snip) (...) Actually it is phone cords which are the crossover type. Use of a patch- cord tester confirms this. I am not familiar with any RJ11 network cables, but I know that (...) (28 years ago, 7-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Re[2]: phone cord length —Fred G. Martin
| | | | | thx for correcting my wording. e.g., instead of saying "half twist" i should say "straight through". anyhow, we agree on the definition of what is a phone cable and what is not a phone cable, we just have a different way of illustrating it. the (...) (28 years ago, 7-Mar-97, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | | |
