 | | Easiest way to add two more input and output compares?
|
|
Well, I have ny Handyboard running a little lawnmower around, but I can only feasibly get two PWM signals in for processing and relaying on to the motor drivers. I need two more signals (drive and steering, all I'm doing now is camera pan/tilt) to (...) (28 years ago, 28-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: your mail
|
|
(...) And to add to all the confusion, see page A-15 of the same book, which contradicts what page 10-14 says. I followed he instructions on page 10-14 and it worked. Also remember those odd word-blitz methods of clearing a single bit only seem to (...) (28 years ago, 28-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | (no subject)
|
|
(...) I found this entry in the HC11 handbook, page 10-14. It may help.. "The most common way of clearing a status flag bit in the timer flag registers is to load an accumulator with a mask that has a one in the bit(s) corresponding to the flag(s) (...) (28 years ago, 28-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | BCLR TFLG1,X %11111101?
|
|
In the file encoders.asm, there's a section like: Port1_ShaftInt: LDX variable_port1_shaft_count [stuff deleted] BCLR TFLG1,X %11111101 RTI I'm trying to figure out what the BCLR line does. Why does it clear the bits of all the timers _except_ the (...) (28 years ago, 28-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re:
|
|
(...) Lyle, The following provide PLCC-to-breadboard adapters: Amaze Electronics Co. Tel: 1-800-996-2008 Web: www.hooked.net/users/amaze Technological Arts Tel: 1-416-963-8996 Web: www.io.org/~techart You can see their ad on the July 1996 issue of (...) (28 years ago, 27-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | (no subject)
|
|
(...) I agree that the "software" solution in an HC11 is limiting. It is this limitation that I am trying to overcome in hardware. Rather than shift a bit-pattern out for PWM, I would use three of the built-in timers to accomplish the task. One (...) (28 years ago, 27-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re:
|
|
(...) Actually an 'HC11 isn't a very efficient PWM controller. However a Microchip PIC is. (or a Motorola 68HC05, or a Siemans 87C752, etc) These single chip microcontrollers are both cost effective and easy to use. In the July (or August) '95 issue (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | (no subject)
|
|
My earlier posting has left me thinking.. (Suprise!) A MUCH more efficient way of doing PWM would be to use another 'HC11. The counter-timer circuits are perfect for the job, and the SPI would serve just fine for communications. Of course, this (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | (no subject)
|
|
What's Happening?? (Or, trying to spark some interaction) I currently am working on a few hardware projects for the Handy-Board.. As I may have described earlier.. Current projects include 4 boards, each on a PC slightly smaller than the (...) (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: ??
|
|
(...) Ahh, well that's good, and bad. :-) C'mon everyone, what's everybody _doing_ with their handy board? Letting it sit on the desk, beeping and collecting dust? (28 years ago, 26-Jun-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
