To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 9950
9949  |  9951
Subject: 
Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:00:40 GMT
Viewed: 
114 times
  
"TM" == Tobias Möller <tobias.moller@telia.com> writes:

TM> If I´ve understood this multi-tasking right, then it means that
TM> you can have one program running for the motors of a robot, and
TM> another for the sensors, but at the same time.

It could mean that, yes. However, you needn't restrict yourself like
that. You can have a number of programs running (how many was that
again?), and they certainly don't have to limit themselves to either
sensors or motors. Just like on just about any computer these days,
multi tasking means that the computer can (appear to) do multiple
things at the same time. While you're busy reading this article, for
example, your MP3 player may continue playing a song, and the clock on
your desktop will update, and, well, who knows what else.

Regards,

Johannes.
--
"If 600 Hertz, 700 must kill." -- The Spin Doctors

Virtually researching virtual behaviour in a virtual world.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
 
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, David Leeper writes: I´m no computer programmer, but I´ve downloaded NQC but haven´t installed it yet. If I´ve understood this multi-tasking right, then it means that you can have one program running for the motors of a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR