To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 8896
8895  |  8897
Subject: 
Re: Rack and Pinion Steering and idea for precise angle of rotation detection
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 22:19:05 GMT
Original-From: 
The WordMeister <dwilcox@wordsmithdigital.STOPSPAMcom>
Viewed: 
580 times
  
I haven't been reading this list _that_ long, but will carefully look at the
assembly tonight to see if it is putting particular stress/deformation on
anything..

I don't believe that it is vital to have the axles line up this way. The
movement of the wheels while turning describes an arc--small, but enough to
actually have the wheels rotate slightly while the assembly turns.

Also not in the scan is a 1x1 stud, 3x1 plate, and second pivoted shaft
embedded in a 2 x 2 brick I added below the double-bored bricks to keep the
wheels from falling off so easily.

Thanks [all] for the comments/attention. I hope to actually have some NQC
code up soon for subroutines to drive this puppy. As I think I've mentioned,
a steering mechanism of this type isn't actually the "best" for a small
double-motored robot, but it has a "coolness factor" that was hard to pass
up.

--Doug Wilcox

From: dave madden <dhm@mersenne.com>
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Date: Thursday, December 09, 1999 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Rack and Pinion Steering and idea for precise angle of rotation
detection


=>> On it (http://www.wordsmithdigital.com/mindstorms/rack-and.htm) is a • scan
=>> and detailed description of my (at last) finally-successful • implementation
=>> of a rack-and-pinion type of steering mechanism...

I just looked at your pictures, and I wonder if the way you've got the
final axles mounted (1x2 gray 2-hole beam, studs into side of 1x6
yellow 5-hole beam) is OK.  I seem to recall reading somewhere that
the parts fit that way, but that the mating caused deformation of
either the studs or the holes if left for a long time.

Does anybody else remember that passage?  Or am I just inventing
excuses for why I didn't think of this nice solution? :-)

d.




1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR