Subject:
|
Re: Move the processing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:42:17 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Bert van Dam <BVANDAM@stopspammersCONCEPTS.NL>
|
Viewed:
|
610 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Christian,
I've done that for the Cybremaster (check out my website for examples), the
same can be done for the Mindstorm.
CU Bert
Lego robots and artificial intelligence www.bvandam.net
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Christian Jacobsen <xtian@net-collect.com>
Aan: lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Datum: vrijdag 19 november 1999 18:17
Onderwerp: Move the processing?
> OK, another newbie question before I get my MindStorms this weekend. • (Thanks
> for the tip, Janos!)
>
> There is a lot of talk on this list about what can and can not be done in
> the RCX... memory stacks, neural nets, and what have you...
>
> There has also been talk about legOS and other approaches to completely
> removing the LEGO firmware(?) and replacing it with another.
>
>
> My question is: Is it possible to create a communications link between a
> desktop PC (which is better at computing than the RCX) and the RCX (which • is
> more mobile than the PC) so that the "heavy" software runs on the PC, and
> sends just the resulting commands to the RCX?
>
> Is the speed of the connection fast enough to do this, realistically? (I
> don't want any 2 minute delay between input and action like the Mars
> Rover...)
>
> Can the RCX firmware just be a simple mechanism that receives commands,
> executes, and responds?
>
>
> I'm just trying to think "outside the (RCX) box"...
> - Christian
>
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
