Subject:
|
Re: RCX output
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 18:24:47 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Paul Speed <pspeed@augustschell.com!NoMoreSpam!>
|
Viewed:
|
644 times
|
| |
|
|
Arjen Gerstel wrote:
>
> Jonathan Perret wrote in message
> <005c01bf2f78$e014be20$9edbc6d4@phantom.cybercable.fr>...
> > > It does go through batteries fast, but we have used ni-cads from
> > > the start, and have recently switched to the 'pure energy' because
> > > of a combination of price, higher power, and claimed
> > > enviro-friendliness.
> >
> >
> > What do you call 'pure energy' ?
>
> I expect he means these new high-powered matter/antimatter
> batteries ;-) They produce a lot of energy and no waste at all!
The problem I have found with these is having to replace
the dilithium crystals. I have found that the power levels drop
significantly even with only minor crystal matrix deterioration.
It makes it tough to power any serious application without resorting
to the wall-wart.
>
> Just kidding,
Likewise,
-Paul (pspeed@progeeks.com, http://www.progeeks.com/)
>
> Arjen
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCX output
|
| Jonathan Perret wrote in message <005c01bf2f78$e014be...ble.fr>... (...) I expect he means these new high-powered matter/antimatter batteries ;-) They produce a lot of energy and no waste at all! Just kidding, Arjen (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
