 | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Robert Munafo
|
| | | Just for the record, the real URL is: (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Eric Brok
|
| | | | Robert Munafo wrote in message ... (...) The URL I gave is just as real ;-) I prefer people to use the latter URL since it enables them to navigate the site. Eric (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | Sorry Eric -- the frames just take up too way much space in the window (over 50 percent!). Most of the time when I visit such a heavily framed site, I have to use the "Open frame in New Window" command just to read the content. I posted the URL to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Eric Brok
|
| | | | Robert Munafo wrote in message ... (...) (over 50 (...) to (...) posted (...) use (...) to (...) I don't want to get into the frames debate here, but I just like to note that the real-estate issue is different from the frames/no frames debate. Both (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Paul Speed
|
| | | | (...) Strictly speaking, not true. A large page with navigation along the top is much better for those with limited screen real estate than a large page in a frame with a navigation frame at the top. Without frames, as soon as the user scrolls down (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scout secrets revealed —Eric Brok
|
| | | | Points taken. (...) Main reason for that (I think) is the bookmark/url problem, which indeed started this thread. But it is possible to use frames that *are* bookmarkable[1]. I don't use on my site because of some technical issues, but I would (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
