 | | Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English —The WordMeister
|
| | | Jesper: Thanks for posting the scans of the Constructopedia 1.5 last week. The comparison was fascinating, especially finding out what the "new" pieces were in the set. Some debate remains in my mind--has Lego made the RIS set slightly less valuable (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | RE: Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English —Tilman Sporkert
|
| | | | | (...) If you look closely at the parts list in 1.0 vs 1.5, you will notice that the composition of pieces has changed in many ways. 1.0 has 26 2x4 bricks, and a couple 2x6 and 2x8 bricks for example. 1.5 has only 5 2x4 bricks, and no 2x6 or 2x8 (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English —Ankesh Kadakia
|
| | | | I've missed the parts list comparison between 1.0 and 1.5. Can anyone tell me where I can get this information? Thanks, Ankesh Kadakia The WordMeister wrote in message <01bf2267$7eae6f00$2...ci.net>... (...) TLG) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English —Jesper Kjaer
|
| | | | (...) (URL) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
