Subject:
|
Re: !!! Laser attachments for Mindstorms !!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:18:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.ORGstopspammers
|
Viewed:
|
550 times
|
| |
|
|
Kay Neuenhofen <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote:
> Yes, plus two touch sensors to implement bumpers. Otherwise, you won't
> know when you hit an obstacle. That leads to sensor multiplexing, as
Why, if you're keeping track of motion? I mean, if you suddenly stop, it's
probably safe to assume you've hit something. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: !!! Laser attachments for Mindstorms !!!
|
| (...) In fact the rotation sensors work much better for this, because they will easily tell you when you stopped in any direction. It is much more complex to build a bumper which surrounds the RCX and can detect hits from most any direction. I did (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: !!! Laser attachments for Mindstorms !!!
|
| (...) Yes, plus two touch sensors to implement bumpers. Otherwise, you won't know when you hit an obstacle. That leads to sensor multiplexing, as described in the NQC tutorial. I ended up doing some filtering on the raw multiplexed input, to (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
