Subject:
|
Re: Dual Differential Adder/Subtractor (again!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:08:43 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
alex wetmore <alex@phred.#nomorespam#org>
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
From: "christie" <christie@apple.com>
> Here's the question -- Have people had better luck with this type of
> construct at the head of the drivetrain, with higher RPMs and lower • torque,
> or in the at the end, with higher torque and final drive?
I've had good luck in the middle. I run my differentials directly off of an
8t gear mounted on the motor, and then run large wheels directly off of the
output.
When playing around with designs (I spent quite a while looking at different
designs) I found that the most important thing in getting high efficiency
was to minimize the gear count in forward motion, and to try and minimize
the use of 8t gears.
In your design I would start by driving the lower differential using a 8t
gear, and running tires off of the two protruding axles. This way for
forward motion you only have one gear mesh in motion between the motor and
your wheels.
alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Dual Differential Adder/Subtractor (again!)
|
| Last night I built my own variant of the "Dual Differential Adder/Subtractor" cliche, basing it on the Cyberia (URL) "adjacent" design (thanks a million, whoever you are -- there was no mailto: link on the web page), modifying the cage length to (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
