 | | Re: Q:Best approach to line tracking
|
|
This is mainly for people who still want to stick to just one light sensor -- You can still figure out which way to turn even with just one sensor, by following the edge of the line rather than trying to follow the center. This works only if your (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Q:Best approach to line tracking
|
|
have you tested this approach? it seems like it would work, but the light sensor would have to be fairly far off the surface to get a wide viewing area. it seems it would also get a little hairy with the inconsistency of lighting to determine (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Q:Best approach to line tracking
|
|
(...) No. I read about it on web page that describes someone's line follower. They said they had gotten it to work. Sorry, but I don't know the URL -- I've seen so many line followers I can't keep track. (...) Sensor height, speed and line width all (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Q:Best approach to line tracking
|
|
I've used a similar approach, and it does work, but you still can't go very fast. I'd like to try a double sensor approach, myself ... have a friend bringing a second set by this weekened. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
