To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 3531
3530  |  3532
Subject: 
Re: C++ (was kernel hackers)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 23:52:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1015 times
  
Luis Villa wrote:

I had
been planning on using legOS, but the transition to C might be messy for
some, and so any opportunity to use C++ instead would be great.

Isn't writing in C easier than C++? Assuming they know the basics of the
C language, I would have thought using functions is a simpler concept
than methods. I'm just curious, rather than authoritive :)

Richard

--
Remove everything in-between and including the '_'s to reply!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: C++ (was kernel hackers)
 
(...) If you already know a language, naturally it will be easier to write in that language than one which you are not yet familiar. However... C programming is not any harder or easier than C++. C is "simpler" than C++ -- whether this makes it (...) (26 years ago, 8-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  C++ (was kernel hackers)
 
Dave and others- I'm actually very interested in using C++ with the RCX. C++ is what our intro CS course is taught in at Duke, and we are looking to snag some of those kids for a robotics course based (tentatively) on the RIS. I had been planning on (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
10 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR