Subject:
|
Re: can nqc control index of values?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:27:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3414 times
|
| |
|
|
You can't explicitly assign variables to slots, but the allocation is
simple enough - they get allocated in the same order they are declared,
starting with 0. I can't promise that the allocation order will never
change, but on the other hand I can't imaging why I'd change it.
Dave
In article <36AF63CD.57547939@objectrad.com>, GK Khalsa
<khalsa@objectrad.com> wrote:
> I have been using the Smalltalk Bot-kit for programming, and I think it's
> great. But as the code grew, I ran into a Spirit exception, that
> locks up the port. Anyway, I'll move the code to nqc, but I was
> taking advantage of a feature I don't see in nqc.
>
> Does nqc gove you control over the index of the 32 values? In
> the smalltalk bot-kit, when you define a value, you can assign it
> a slot. I use this trick to communicate between separate programs,
> run at separate times.
>
> For instance, in tic-tac-toe, program 2 is
> the game-start program, which initializes the globals. Program
> 3 is the robot's turn program, run each time it is the robot's
> turn. Values representing the state of the game are represented
> in both programs, using the same slots.
>
> In some ways, this is like an extra sensor. Without it
> I would an input to indicate when it is the robot's turn to a
> single, game-playing program.
>
> Or, an I missing someting?
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | can nqc control index of values?
|
| I have been using the Smalltalk Bot-kit for programming, and I think it's great. But as the code grew, I ran into a Spirit exception, that locks up the port. Anyway, I'll move the code to nqc, but I was taking advantage of a feature I don't see in (...) (28 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
