 | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas. —Brett Carver
|
| | | (...) I replied to these questions from an e-mail Ian sent, but since it's here as a post also, I'll (partially) reply here too. I don't have any pictures, but I am working on a web site that will document all my custom input and output devices. I (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas. —Gregor Benedikt Rochow
|
| | | | (...) Another way to do it might be ( - I have not built this, but been thinking about it for a while, as I want to use it with a (manual, and possibly later also motor-driven) car transmission of the common sliding-axle type - ) to use rubber (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas. —Ian Sinclair
|
| | | | (...) The use of a spring loaded system using rubber bands or such would be a good idea for two position systems. But I can't think how to do it for transmissions like my current two that four positions. I think I'm going to try a motor with a worm (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas. —Mike Moran
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, just been thinking about this. You could have a shaft that was free to move back and forth along it axis. On the end of this you would have a series of N spokes. Each spoke ends with a free to move wheel (the axis of the wheel is arranged (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
