Subject:
|
Re: FW: simple but functional radar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:00:25 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Peter Hesketh <PBH@PHESK.DEMONsaynotospam.CO.UK>
|
Viewed:
|
1115 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <01BE3E64.27C95430.rgiannin@shaw.wave.ca>, Rob Giannini
<rgiannin@shaw.wave.ca> writes
> Right now my Robot is being controlled by the PC, does anyone know will the
> Radar Bot idea intercept signals from the Tower and think that it is near
> an object ?
Yes
--
Regards - Peter Hesketh, Mynyddbach, Mon.
Forty reasons why a dog is better than a woman: number 17
"A dog's disposition stays the same all month long."
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FW: simple but functional radar
|
| Ok concept..don't know if the RCX can handle this but could the RCX issue a coded ping, and wait for it to bounce, using the time delay to calculate the distance to the nearest object? or is th RCX clock to slow for this?? (...) Joe Greene Technical (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | FW: simple but functional radar
|
| Right now my Robot is being controlled by the PC, does anyone know will the Radar Bot idea intercept signals from the Tower and think that it is near an object ? I would try my self, but I don't want to rebuild by current robot at the moment. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
