 | | Re: Brickworld 2007 - Indy 5.00
|
|
[Sorry, I know this is a duplicate for some of you on the mailing list, but I wanted to answer this in LUGNET and hadn't realized before this is where the email came from. My bad.] (...) The bumper can be studded or studless, and could certainly (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickworld 2007 - Indy 5.00
|
|
(1) "the bumper should be at the height of the red Technic beam in this figure" Does this mean that a the design must use a studded beam? (A stud-less beam is not as "tall" as the beam in the image.) (2) "The bumper must be straight and not angled (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickworld 2007 - Indy 5.00
|
|
(...) That appears to be a typo. The track fits on a FLL table, so it's a 44"x92" inch oval. And the lane is about 2ft wide. It's pretty easy to build and program a robot for this event. It just needs to follow a specific shade (actual value will (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickworld 2007 - Indy 5.00
|
|
(...) Seems clear to me :) there will be magic.... Actually - looks like a really wacky typo. Hopefully Steve H or Brian D jumps in to clarify for certain. But, I believe the full track layout is 4' x 8'. So, the track itself is just under 2' wide. (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickworld 2007 - Indy 5.00
|
|
(...) Okay, I'm confused. How can an 8' x 10' track be centered on a 4' by 8' surface? What is the actual width of the track? If the whole track fits on a 4' x 8' surface, then I would assume the width must be less then 2'. Gus (18 years ago, 17-Jun-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, lugnet.robotics)
|
