 | | Re: circular pointer
|
| I've added my comments to the code you posted (they start with **). I've also added some indenting.: #define SIZE 3 int v[SIZE],i,sum,ave; // initialize the array and some other variables sum = 0; for (i=0;i<SIZE-1;i++) { //I think this means set (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: circular pointer
|
| I've inserted some comments, not all are questions, some are simply 'thinking aloud'. (...) So by defining SIZE here I can easily change the size of the macro without having to alter anything else in the code. Nice! (...) Right you are, I should (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: circular pointer
|
| In lugnet.robotics, linmix <linmix@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] (...) [snip] I would say defining SIZE changes the size of the array and thus the period of the moving average. I'm not sure how you mean "macro" in this context. [snip] (...) Yes, both (...) (17 years ago, 13-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: circular pointer
|
| (...) I should have written: 'array' (...) OK, undefined is not the same as zero, that makes sense (in a way). I looked up how to initialise an array and according to Dave Baum's NQC Guide "The initial values for an array's elements cannot be (...) (17 years ago, 14-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
