To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 2706
2705  |  2707
Subject: 
RE: simple but functional radar
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 02:38:24 GMT
Original-From: 
Tim McSweeney <tim@!spamcake!ams.co.nz>
Viewed: 
980 times
  
I think you misunderstood a bit.  You still use the Light Sensor as
discussed to get an approximate range, It'll never be great, All you use the
RCX's IR input for is to verify that the signal you recieved was the one you
sent out.

The two work together to solve the problem.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Eilebrecht [mailto:ericeil@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 3:31 PM
To: 'tim@ams.co.nz'; 'lego-robotics@crynwr.com'
Subject: RE: simple but functional radar


Yes, but even if that was posible it would give you no indication of
distance.

Eric


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McSweeney [mailto:tim@ams.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 6:31 PM
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: simple but functional radar


With this IR Radar stuff is the reflected signal that is
picked up by the
sensor also strong enough to be picked up by the RCX?  if so....

Send Out a number N,
If the sensor thinks there is something close then
if last number received via IR port == N  then
it's probably us
Change N
Repeat.

If you change N randomly and sample several times before
making a decision
then you can be pretty sure that it's your own reflection you
are "seeing"
and not a tower or hostile RCX :)

Cheers
Tim


--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: simple but functional radar
 
Yes, but even if that was posible it would give you no indication of distance. Eric -----Original Message----- From: Tim McSweeney [mailto:tim@ams.co.nz] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 6:31 PM To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: Re: simple but (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR