Subject:
|
!! Way To Go Janet & Carl !!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 02:36:47 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Nick Taylor <ntaylor@iname.com>
|
Viewed:
|
2879 times
|
| |
|
|
Janet and Carl McIver wrote:
> Alright, lets confront the Lego purists! I really doubt that on this
> list there are enough purists to do any damage to those of us interested in
> learning about robots, and I don't think they number enough to do this list
> any damage.
> So, so as to not stifle the free flow of free thinking, I propose we
> dispense with the obligitory disclaimers and not confuse the lurkers with
> robots of mixed breed. After all, if we have used non-Lego software in our
> robots, that must be a first commandment sin.
> I know, I wrote 'em! The reason I wrote them is to poke fun at the
> supposed purists, whoever they are.
> So there, come hunt me down, make me search out the Mega Blocks from my
> kids tubs, make me take the gearbox out of my walker! Any takers? I didn't
> think so! I waggle my tongue at you! Pffffffftt!
> Lets hear about how Lego can learn from the overaged kids with fast
> computers and degrees!
> Yeehaa!
>
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | The rules is the rules is the rules
|
| Alright, lets confront the Lego purists! I really doubt that on this list there are enough purists to do any damage to those of us interested in learning about robots, and I don't think they number enough to do this list any damage. So, so as to (...) (28 years ago, 12-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
