 | | Re: GBC at BrickFest 2006 —Brian Davis
|
| | | (...) Yeah, that's suspiciously absent from my video. I'm uploading another one now: (URL) Google version is really jerky I'm afraid.) This one starts with the train being loaded, but then follows the train to the next unloading module so you can (...) (18 years ago, 6-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: GBC at BrickFest 2006 —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) I downloaded it completely and don't see any jerkiness, maybe that was due to streaming it as the bandwidth from Google was a bit low (< 100kB/s). (...) But then it may need to accept a lot of balls, if the other modules are quicker. I know (...) (18 years ago, 6-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GBC at BrickFest 2006 —Brian Davis
|
| | | | | (...) You're correct, I was streaming it from Google which was probably the issue. (...) It doesn't matter how much quicker than the standard a single module is - if it only gets 1 bps, then it can only pass them to the downstream module at 1 bps... (...) (18 years ago, 6-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GBC at BrickFest 2006 —Rafe Donahue
|
| | | | (...) I raised this issue in June when discussing GBC reliability, seeing that 1 bps implies a measured time interval. Of course, what is the interval?, I asked. The general consensus is that it is a 30 second time interval. As such, the worst you (...) (18 years ago, 7-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GBC at BrickFest 2006 —David Hurley
|
| | | | (...) LOL!! That may be an idea for next year. To come up with a mindstorms concept/competition that appeals to the other gender as well...maybe Bunnie or our significant others can come up with it! Dave (18 years ago, 7-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
