To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 26285
  Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
 
(...) Thanks for your replies. Both are RCX2 and I use the Robolab software. In Administrator / RCX settings you can set the RCX IR-power setting to high or low, but both were already in high. After some testing I found out that the main problem are (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
 
(...) Depending on the kind of rechargeables you are using, they generally have significantly different characteristics. They also often output a slightly lower voltage (about 1.2 or 1.3v per cell as opposed to the expected 1.5). If you have a (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
 
Hi Danny, (...) Have you seen real failures using some rechargeables batteries? I believe that the RCX motor driver IC is really foolproof, and I don't think anything could be destroyed using various kind of batteries (provided that the 9 or 10 (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
 
(...) I have not seen them on the RCX, but I have on other devices, where power transisotrs have died. Its all to do (I think) with the characteristics under load, and the fact that larger spikes in current may occur with rechargeables. If the IC (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: RCX infra red sensitivity
 
(...) Yes, the driver IC is current-limited to about 500mA (and thermal limited too), so it is very hard to destroy! (...) I have used NiMH batteries a lot on RCX, the only adverse effect I noticed is that the power available on motors is nearly (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR