 | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed
|
| (...) Actually I thought the decision was more of a 'wait and see' than a definite 'no reason to'. There were quite a few very enthusiastic responses to having an NXT group created, and three our four equally enthusiastic disagreements initially. (...) (19 years ago, 7-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed
|
| (...) I am in favor of creating a new group. Just as we wouldn't want messages about the Spybot brick or the Scout brick getting lost in a sea of messages about the RCX we do not want messages specific to the RCX to be lost in a sea of messages (...) (19 years ago, 7-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed
|
| (...) Thanks, John. You've described things well. I'm holding off on creating a new group for a few reasons. One is: when more information comes to light about the NXT, it may become apparent that 'RCX' is a good place for discussion of it. (Heh, At (...) (19 years ago, 9-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: NXT newsgroup needed
|
| (...) As I've been one of the lucky few who have had the opportunity to play with the NXT as part of the MDP, I can tell you that these two are vastly different beasts. I've found the hardware, software, even building techniques to be significantly (...) (19 years ago, 10-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
