 | | Motor Analysis —Andrew Meyer
|
| | | The FLL team that I mentor has several hundred motors, both the new and the old ones. This wealth of motors got me thinking "Well, out of that size a sample, there's gotta be two that are perfectly matched, and some that are close. I should analyze (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Motor Analysis —John Barnes
|
| | | | | (...) Did you check here; (URL) has done a lot of work which might be of use. JB (18 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Motor Analysis —Matthew Ruschmann
|
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure how to grab data from the RCX with the 'standard' tools. However... as much as I am for wild statistical analysis with a computer, the easiest solution might be to just use one of those cool LEGO differential axels. Put one motor (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Motor Analysis —Jutta Rossmaier
|
| | | | (...) I use the LEGO speedometer (5206) to find matching motors for my robotics classes. Works reasonably well. Fast and easy. Regards, Jutta Rossmaier (18 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Motor Analysis —Chio Siong Soh
|
| | | | (...) I wouldn't go too far in this exercise of matching motors. Even if you were to able to get two perfectly matched motors on your robot, chances are it will still not go perfectly straight due to many other factors. Notably, if you have a (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
