 | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) Two things Steve: 1) THANK YOU so much for updating everyone! That's mighty nice of you! 2) AHHH...HHH! :)! -aps (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) Wait, I have one more: 3) Steve, do you know if people will be able to announce that they received a "golden ticket"? (cue song) -aps (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) This is my guess for the sequence for people (1) purchased their NXT (2) receive an NDA (3) receive their NXT So, during the time between 1 & 2, you may be able to say whatever you want, keeping in mind, if you're a real jerk, LEGO could (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) Do we even know that people in the "beta test" will be required to sign NDAs? What benifit to LEGO would there be by having people sign NDAs? (much better to have everyone spreading the word and getting free word-of-mouth advertizing :) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) One of the things they were looking for was people who would write significant NXT content - books, papers, articles and web sites, so I would guess not. Thomas (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) And since one of the areas they're looking for people to contribute is in blogging, it would truly be counterproductive. They might have some kind of agreement that allows people to talk but not to share internals or something like that--but (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: MDP Status - Update
|
| (...) There is a very fine line from comprimising your product and restricting your developer program too much to be really useful. Also, with products that contain IP from multiple sources it can even be more hairy. Think about it: there is the (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
