 | | The LAST post (hopefully) about Java and the NXT —javaspaces
|
| | | Look, There's been a pretty heated debate about support for Java on the NXT. All we're asking for is TLG to support Java **in addition to** whatever GUI/Labview programming environment that will be used for the general masses out there. I think that (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The LAST post (hopefully) about Java and the NXT —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) It depends what you mean by "support". If you mean provide information for a 3rd party to develop and maintain a Java runtime for the brick then I agree totally! But if you mean actually do the development, or fund it it some way, I disagree. (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Non-purist LEGO Robots: was [The LAST post (hopefully) about Java and the NXT] —Mr S
|
| | | | --- Ross Crawford <ross.{mylastname}@gmail.com> wrote: [SNIP] (...) kids - please let (...) Wow, that is well put. On that note, does anyone know of a good combination of bricks to 'hack' or modify so that you could encapsulte something like an ARM (...) (18 years ago, 21-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Non-purist LEGO Robots: was [The LAST post (hopefully) about Java and the NXT] —
|
| | | | I was thinking maybe just a new board that fits in the original brick. Another processor, more memory, a complex connector out the end to connect up non-lego sensors, cameras and other devices needing digital communications interfaces. C. Fred (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
