Subject:
|
Re: USB Host and Slave
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:57:56 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
steve <sjbaker1@airmail.net#Spamcake#>
|
Viewed:
|
1662 times
|
| |
|
|
PeterBalch wrote:
> There's been a lot of discussion of how hard it is to make a USB host
> compared to a Slave.
>
> But that's a general-purpose USB host (like a PC). What if it were a
> "special purpose" host.
>
> The slave probably doesn't care if it has been interrogated, negotiated and
> enumerated or whatever. If if the host already knew what the slave was
> (e.g. it's always a thumb drive) then writing the host would be a whole lot
> easier. Perhaps.
One VERY significant electrical difference is that the host provides
power to run the slave. Since the NXT thinks it's a slave, it won't
provide power - so your thumb drive will have no power.
So - no matter what, there is at least *SOME* hacking and slashing of
hardware required.
> Useful cheap USB devices would be a thumb drive, a webcam, an optical
> mouse, etc.
Yeah - any of those would be insanely cool to have on a robot.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | USB Host and Slave
|
| (...) ARM? (...) USB devices seems (...) There's been a lot of discussion of how hard it is to make a USB host compared to a Slave. But that's a general-purpose USB host (like a PC). What if it were a "special purpose" host. The slave probably (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
