 | | Re: Where should the 100 NXT testers' findings be shown? —Jamie Bliss
| | | | (...) What's wrong with BrickWiki? (URL) If it's lacking info, fix it. It has more info than a brand-new wiki. If it's slow, we're working on improving that. If you don't like the domain name, we're willing to let someone donate one. (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Where should the 100 NXT testers' findings be shown? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Actually someone did already, BrickWiki can be found at (URL) I agree with Jamie, BrickWiki would be an ideal place for this rather than fragmenting things. But if one is set up elsewhere BW will link to it, no doubt. (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where should the 100 NXT testers' findings be shown? —Brian Davis
| | | | | | | (...) Nothing. I suspect NXT stuff will end up everywhere. But, I think LEGO will probably strongly encourage some system of their own as well. After all, I doubt they're throwing 100 units to the public at a discount just to see what happens. I (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where should the 100 NXT testers' findings be shown? —Jordan Bradford
| | | | | (...) I didn't know it existed. Sorry! :) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | | |
