 | | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
| (...) I second that. Actually, is there a great deal of NXT stuff that should be separate from the RCX stuff? Maybe another group isn't required. Steve (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
| | | | | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
| Steve Hassenplug writes: > Actually, is there a great deal of NXT stuff that should be > separate from the RCX stuff? Maybe another group isn't required. Don't split the community. That would be bad. Time will tell if there needs to be a separate (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
| (...) The thing is there are already RCX, Scout, Microscout, spybotics, and cybermastger sub-groups, and it hasn't hurt anything. Kev (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
| (...) How do you know? Perhaps topics discussed on one of those lists would have been of tremendous value to someone on one of the other lists - since that person didn't see the message, they'd never know that they'd suffered. It's hard to prove a (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
