Subject:
|
Re: Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 00:25:31 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
steve <SJBAKER1@nomorespamAIRMAIL.NET>
|
Viewed:
|
1180 times
|
| |
|
|
Mr S wrote:
> In any test of intelligence or test for intelligence
> that I have heard of, none pass the last two points.
> Yet, somehow, even a 4 month old baby is able to have
> both an agenda and an attention span even though it
> has failed to learn anything useful to the parents
> thus far, and in fact, would not be able to pass the
> Turing test...
The Turing test only says that a system that can pass
the test should be considered intelligent - not that
a system that cannot pass the test is not intelligent.
This is an important criticism of the test. There
are a lot of very clever AI programs out there that
cannot pass the Turing test because (amongst other
things) they don't know who Santa Claus is. This
doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't intelligent.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Design
|
| Steve, I agree, the Turing test is not up to date, and even in its time did not indicate intelligence accurately, though I would go so far as to say that those intelligent programs that might pass the Turing test won't pass the test of demonstrating (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Design
|
| Dan, I wouldn't have argued it quite that way, but then I wouldn't have been so eloquent. On the human mind and simulation (mimicry) of it, I have three observations: Intelligent behavior has a goal (easy to mimic) Intelligence has an agenda (not (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
