 | | RCX Question —Kevin McClure
|
| | | Just wondering, can you download firmware fron the 2.0 cd onto a 1.0 RCX? -Kevin (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCX Question —Mr S
|
| | | | In a word, yes (...) ___...___ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. (URL) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX Question —Andrew Meyer
|
| | | | (...) What I have found is that, on most 1.0's, it takes two or three tries before the 2.0 firmware "takes". I have no idea why this is, but once you have "broken it in", the 1.0 will not give you problems in the future if you need to redownload (...) (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCX Question —steve
|
| | | | (...) I've never come across this phenomenon - mine have all worked first time. All of the RCX versions are the same except for the external power socket on the 1.0's. In terms of software, firmware, etc they are all utterly identical. (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | IR Performance -- 'standard' vs 'fast' (2400 vs 4800) and RIS 1.0 and 2.0 —Dick Swan
|
| | | | Several recent posts about infrared signaling performance with and without fast download (2400 vs 4800 baud, with and without message 'complement' bytes) on 1.0 and 2.0 bricks. Here's some results of testing five COM Towers and five USB towers with (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IR Performance -- 'standard' vs 'fast' (2400 vs 4800) and RIS 1.0 and 2.0 —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | Dick Swan wrote: <SNIP> (...) Which explains why I could not get quad speed downloading to work with the USB tower on my 1.0 brick on my setup for the Tcl Console for pbForth. (...) Great idea! In case you don't hear this enough, I really appreciate (...) (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
