To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 24554
24553  |  24555
Subject: 
Re: RCX Question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:47:27 GMT
Original-From: 
steve <sjbaker1@airmail.net%antispam%>
Viewed: 
1257 times
  
Andrew Meyer wrote:

What I have found is that, on most 1.0's, it takes two or three tries before the
2.0 firmware "takes".

I've never come across this phenomenon - mine have all worked first time.

All of the RCX versions are the same except for the external power
socket on the 1.0's.  In terms of software, firmware, etc they are all
utterly identical.



Message has 1 Reply:
  IR Performance -- 'standard' vs 'fast' (2400 vs 4800) and RIS 1.0 and 2.0
 
Several recent posts about infrared signaling performance with and without fast download (2400 vs 4800 baud, with and without message 'complement' bytes) on 1.0 and 2.0 bricks. Here's some results of testing five COM Towers and five USB towers with (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCX Question
 
(...) What I have found is that, on most 1.0's, it takes two or three tries before the 2.0 firmware "takes". I have no idea why this is, but once you have "broken it in", the 1.0 will not give you problems in the future if you need to redownload (...) (19 years ago, 24-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR