Subject:
|
Re: Is it possible for a robot to count studs?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:18:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1569 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> Is there a way to do it without a rotation sensor?
If you are moving slow enough, one possibility is using black friction pegs
on a technic beam, say, one every other hole, and a touch sensor that moves by
them counting them. If timing isn't enough to get you 1 +/- 0.1 stud resolution
between the pegs, use a second technic beam and an 2nd touch sensor (they could
be stacked) offset from the first system. Now it's one touch sensor press per
stud.
You could also "make" a rotation sensor from a cam on an axle and a touch
sensor. Again, as long as you move slowly enough not to drop a count, I'd think
this could provided the needed resolution (especially be gearing up between the
mechanism positioning and the makeshift rotation sensor). Again, not a problem
if the speed isn't all theat important.
I save my rotation sensors for places where I need fast, accurate, real-time
positioning. I love 'em, but they're not stackable, and they're not common (I've
got two, and feel lucky - I really need to order a third).
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is it possible for a robot to count studs?
|
| "Steve Lane yahoo.co.uk>" <stevenrobertlane@<n...pamplease> wrote in message news:IptF5D.vJD@lugnet.com... (...) Is there a way to do it without a rotation sensor? I wasn't planning on a LEGO order from S@H until after the New Year. The other (...) (19 years ago, 12-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
