 | | Robolab's string
|
| As mentioned elsewhere I could be wrong about Robolab. But absent any informative correction from the Robolab experts listening in I am left to my own devices to make heads or tails of what Robolab is teaching our children. And the more I examine (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Robolab's string
|
| (...) John, the program you are proposing for discussion is a good example for bad programming practise, you are absolutely right. I think Dijkstra was the first to insist to banish GOTOs from well structured programming. This was one of the things (...) (20 years ago, 18-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| | | | | A structured programming question
|
| All, Not to start more discussion on structured vs. unstructured programming, and I hope this doesn't. This doesn't necessarily relate directly to the RCX, but I would like to tap some of the knowledge that is on this list. I have had no formal (...) (20 years ago, 18-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Robolab's string
|
| (...) The program I showed was the only way you can write a while (true) loop in Robolab with a break statement to terminate the infinite loop. It is Robolab's standard implementation of that good programming practice. My point was that strings (...) (20 years ago, 19-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| |
