Subject:
|
Re: Robolab Data Acquisition
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:41:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1076 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, John Hansen wrote:
> I don't know, can Robolab do that? :-)
Hopefully somebody who actually knows Robolab well can answer you there,
John. I think I remember that it allowed active IR polling of the RCX even
remotely (i.e. - via the web using LASM), so perhaps. Or, perhaps, I'm just
talking about something I know nothing about <grin>.
> Are you talking about uploading the datalog via BricxCC?
> You definitely get labels if you use -datalog_full or if
> you upload the datalog using BricxCC.
Here I must admit being constrained by my choice of platform - I use MacNQC
under OSX, which is fantastic, but is not currently as up-to-date as BrixCC.
Still plenty for me (even for the datalogging).
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Robolab Data Acquisition
|
| (...) Some of the amazing things Robolab can do with the Datalog are enabled, in part, by the not-available-except...olab-users firmware version they ship with Robolab. I readily admit that a tool (like Robolab) built around a data acquisition (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
