Subject:
|
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:57:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3780 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, March 11, 2005 12:48 pm, Steve Baker said:
> I still think it's a trivial
> rule change for FLL... Other people - ... will never agree.
And, those are the only options? Ok, but it's just not a trivial change.
There are a few other topics we never even touched on, like who can you call to get
support for NQC? Teams would assume they can call LEGO, when in fact they should
call John(?).
And, there's others.
If anyone comes up with anything you can do with NQC, but not Robolab, I may look at
it different, but no one's been able to do that.
So, where is this huge advantage?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| (...) You see, interestingly enough... this is a sort of catch-22 for the people that want NQC allowed. If there is a huge advantage to NQC, people who don't use it might perceive other people using it as somehow unfair to them (even though it _is_ (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| I'm really tired of arguing this. Nobody's minds are being changed. I still think it's a trivial rule change for FLL to fix this and it's long past time that they opened their minds to NQC and other similar systems based on Java or Forth. Other (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
