Subject:
|
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:59:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3754 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Fri, March 11, 2005 12:48 pm, Steve Baker said:
>
> > I still think it's a trivial
> > rule change for FLL... Other people - ... will never agree.
>
>
> And, those are the only options? Ok, but it's just not a trivial change.
>
> There are a few other topics we never even touched on, like who can you call to get
> support for NQC? Teams would assume they can call LEGO, when in fact they should
> call John(?).
>
> And, there's others.
>
> If anyone comes up with anything you can do with NQC, but not Robolab, I may look at
> it different, but no one's been able to do that.
>
> So, where is this huge advantage?
>
> Steve
You see, interestingly enough... this is a sort of catch-22 for the
people that want NQC allowed.
If there is a huge advantage to NQC, people who don't use it might
perceive other people using it as somehow unfair to them (even though it
_is_ available to everyone, unfamiliarity with the tool could
nevertheless be construed as an unfair disadvantage when LEGO themselves
is not actively endorsing the product).
If there isn't a huge advantage with NQC, then trying to argue why it
should be allowed is pointless.
>> Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| On Fri, March 11, 2005 12:48 pm, Steve Baker said: (...) And, those are the only options? Ok, but it's just not a trivial change. There are a few other topics we never even touched on, like who can you call to get support for NQC? Teams would assume (...) (20 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
