 | | Re: expansion ports
|
| In article <F52CB7.LIw@lugnet.com>, Michael Gasperi <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com> writes (...) Does this mean that Torys'R'Us are breaking the law by selling the Mindstorms Set? They are selling lots of things with the connector. How about second (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: expansion ports
|
| (...) LEGO makes and sells the product to Torys'RUs. Torys'RUS can sell it to anybody they want and on and on. This is not what happens if you try to make a LEGO compatable product. Only LEGO has the right to manufacture and sell a product that (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: expansion ports
|
| (...) Reductio ad absurdam: You buy, say, 8880. You lose one of the, say, #12 axles. You replace with 2 #6 and an axle extender. You sell it on (bad move, IMHO, but hey, it could happen :) ). By your reasoning, you now have sold a product, not made (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: expansion ports
|
| Jasper Janssen wrote in message <36a90add.169456990@...et.com>... (...) Your examples are irrelevant because they probably don't still have active patents on the pieces and may or may not have ever had patents on all of them. What I was talking (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: expansion ports
|
| (...) I can make the same case about something they _do_ have a patent on... say, the 12-tooth bevel gear, is pretty new. Does that come with a patent? (...) Devil's advocate. Jasper (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
