Subject:
|
Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:52:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2493 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, "Brass Tilde" <brasstilde@insightbb.com> wrote:
> Even so-called object oriented languages are procedural based at their core,
> and flowcharting, along with other process mapping techniques, are still
> quite helpful.
Danger, that way lies religious war.
I would submit that if you're using a real OO language, ORDs, OADs and OMs are
more useful than flowcharts.
That said, what I have seen of the language that ships with the RCX is not
conductive to structured programming...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems
|
| (...) the same. (...) I'm going to disagree with this one statement, and this one statement only. I've been working in the business world creating software for almost 20 years, and I use flowcharts, and their conceptual children, all the time. While (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
