 | | Re: JCX and Legos to appear in Denmark next week —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | (...) Of course, as the dates on all as yet incomplete portions are crossed out with no tentative new estimates for completion, the schedule is basically worthless. (...) Agreed. Which is unfortunate... the concept is a good one... a powerful (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...) —Wayne Gramlich
|
| | | | (...) [snip JCX schedule comments] (...) I'm just curious what constitutes a system that is Lego compatible enough? -Wayne [snip loss of hope] (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...) —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | | (...) Fair question. In this context, I would say that it is a unit that directly supports LEGO motors and sensors right out of the box. The Handyboard motor outputs may be electrically compatible with LEGO motors, but the unit lacks physical (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...) —Chio Siong Soh
|
| | | | | (...) There's an Expansion Board for the Handyboard that provides 4 inputs for the LEGO active sensors (light and rotation) on 2 lines besides 6 servo ouputs and other good things. (URL) not too difficult to cut the LEGO cables and attach the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...) —Wayne Gramlich
|
| | | | (...) In short, you insist upon both electrical and mechanical compatability. An interesting point of view which happens to be quite different from mine; I will have to think about it some. Thanks, -Wayne (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
