 | | Re: touch sensitive sensor —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | "Chris Phillips" <drvegetable@attbi.com> wrote in message news:HqBKq4.A5I@lugnet.com... (...) news:HqB44J.204J@lugnet.com... (...) robot (...) those (...) can (...) grip is. (...) and the (...) volume (...) the task (...) controler (...) maybe (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: touch sensitive sensor —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Are you sure your multimeter is up to the task? I have measured numerous touch sensors (from 1.5, 2.0 and cybermaster), all of them have a high value when not pressed (open for RIS 1.5 and 2.0, 10 to 15KOhm for Cybermaster that have a (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: touch sensitive sensor —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:HqCD5y.1M6C@lugnet.com... (...) There (...) my (...) ohm (...) touch (...) when not (...) a (...) the (...) Thanx for the info. But 0.1mm is not much travel distanse and the only usable (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: touch sensitive sensor —Dan Lauber
|
| | | | Instead of pressing the touch sensor directly, you could use a lever to press it, thereby giving more precision. "Øyvind Steinnes" <phoenix@online.no> wrote in message news:HqCGJ5.Gz@lugnet.com... (...) 1.5 (...) apart (...) 0 (...) have (...) Ohm, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
