 | | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc? —Gordon Elliott
| | | | On "complexity", I would point out that the computational power of the neural pathways of the house fly thoroughly exceeds the computational throughput of our most massive supercomputer clusters at the moment. True "adaptation" would require (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc? —Steve Baker
| | | | | (...) That was true 20 years ago. A housefly's brain contains just 400 neurons. Your PC can easily simulate a 400 neuron neural network at faster update rates than biological neurons. The problem isn't the raw computational power. ---...--- Steve (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc? —Gordon Elliott
| | | | | | Ah, I do suspect that my data was a little out of date. However the information I see ((URL) Word ".doc" file, or (URL) ) list the housefly at 10^5 or 100,000, to 10^6 or 1 million neurons. This is a little bigger than "400 neurons." In fact the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc? —Jim Choate
| | | | | (...) Roger doger on that. I understand that C. Elegins (sp?) is the current top project goal for this sort of stuff. Something like 10,000 neurons. -- -- Open Forge, LLC 24/365 Onsite Support for PCs, Networks, & Game Consoles 512-695-4126 (Austin, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
