To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20260
20259  |  20261
Subject: 
RE: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:38:28 GMT
Original-From: 
Andrew J. Huang <AJHUANG@VELOCITUS.NETnomorespam>
Viewed: 
601 times
  
Marco thought:

hmmm... I prefer the method using a High_Level • map in the
source code or as a .h file

From a code writing point of view, defining macros
that identify the motor is much nicer than having
to list out the path to the motor.  However, when
you have to replace a dodgy motor on an
individual, you'll have to re-map the motor name
(revise the .h) and then recompile.  If you're on
Mars, or at a standalone (no reprogramming)
competition, a recompile and download isn't
convenient.

A route to the motor isn't so bad since it can be
encoded as a macro just the same:

#define RightHand_Finger1 down_neck, \
   first_right_appendage, \
   past_rotator_cuff, \
   past_elbow-joint, \
   first_daisy chain

...

do_thumb(degrees) {
packet = create_packet();
setPacketDest(packet, RightHandFinger1);
if (degrees > 0)
packet->command = MOTOR_ON_CCW
else
packet->command = MOTOR_ON_CW
packet->value = degrees*SECS_PER_DEGREE;
sendPacket(packet);
free_packet(packet);
}

This is pretty similar to what you suggested, but
abstracting the operations to a little higher
level.

The main codeline should then look like:

main()
do_thumb(10);
do_forefinger(MAX);


etc.

However, the main point is that you can hide an
arbitrary amount of code ugliness.

Best regards,
Andy



Message has 1 Reply:
  RE: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
 
(...) Yes, you're right. :) The alternative would be to tweak the Device_ID/Friendly_Device_Name table in real-time, updating the new Device_ID. Then, the compile-time table with the Friendly_Device_Name...cific_Name would still valid. (...) Seconds (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  RE: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
 
(...) hmmm... I prefer the method using a High_Level map in the source code or as a .h file ///.../// #IFDEF _TWINROBOTA_ #INCLUDE 'TwinRobotA_devmap.h' #ENDIF #IFDEF _TWINROBOTB_ #INCLUDE 'TwinRobotB_devmap.h' #ENDIF #IFDEF _TWINROBOTC_ #INCLUDE (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR