To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 19654
19653  |  19655
Subject: 
Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:05:23 GMT
Viewed: 
5852 times
  
but wher is the fun?

my skirt has been done as a cut of the sphere
the same shapa as the tunnel has to hav (i think)
so it was a middle part of sphere without upper and lower domes
that's why i said "a little bit hard to do it" :))

you said CD is too big
?
CD has 5 1/4 inch so it's not much bigger than you said - 4 inches
but i suppose you are right!

have a look here
http://web.mit.edu/sp.742/www/motor.html

i must check the weight of lego-motors to use your formulas
but they are useful - thanx

i've been trying 12V
and read somewhere that 18V quadruple torque!
so:
aprox:
0.37W * 4 = 1.5W
and 1hp = ca 750W
so lego motor has 0.002 hp
so
we can lift ca 0.3lb
so i think lego motor cannot lift itself
so end of topic isn't it?

the answer is: you stole whole fun from this issue :((((
and now - me too :(((((((((((((

:)
best regards
pixel



"Jim Choate" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.33.0211290805310.1275-100000@einstein.ssz.com...
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, pixel wrote:
> 
> > 1. pure turbine has to be placed in some kind of tunnel but not exactly
> > funnel
> >     the tunnel has to be as a part of ball (sphere) without hats :)) at • the
> > upper and the lower side
> >     because the stream of air has to compact and air cannot escape near • the
> > blade of rotor or turbine
> 
> Bingo.
> 
> > 2. lego motor http://peeron.com/inv/parts/2838c01 is the only one useful
> > because the new motor has no enough speed
> 
> Take a look at some of these micro motors that are being used in the new
> mini-RC cars. You can buy a whole car kit, radio, and controller for about
> $75US.
> 
> > 3. propeler has to be non-lego beacause of weight and shape and • stability
> 
> A helo tail rotor is your best bet. Wood or a composite is your best bet.
> Stay away from -any- metal blades as they are a serious safety hazard in
> this application.
> 
> > 4. turbine can be weighty so motor can rotate it and keep the speed
> > (flywheel)
> 
> No, you don't need a turbine. What you're missing is the ratio of the
> inlet area to exhaust plenum area and the delta-v of the air flow.
> 
> 200lb's will get a good lift from 1/4hp.
> 
> 200lb's   weight of hover
> ------- = ---------------
> 1/4hp     power of motor
> 
> > 5. good turbine is cd-disc :)) cut on chords and bent termicaly (it's • heavy
> > enough) (you need some tools to do it)
> 
> Yuck. A CD disk is -way- too big across, and it's aerodynamic efficiency
> is insufficient to move enough air. At high air speeds the flat 'blades'
> will stall and you will find the flow going down with increases in fan
> speed. Your fan shouldn't be more than about 4 inches across.
> 
> > 6. for me it's impossible to do lego frame light enough (in fact lego • parts
> > are heavy especialy axles)
> 
> I suspect this isn't true. I'd start with a standard green plate and
> eschew the whole idea of a frame, insufficient rigidity in Lego plastic.
> 
> > 7. making skirt is very important (i did it from plastic bag) it's a • little
> > bit hard to do it
> 
> Shouldn't be. I'd suspect it's your process, remember you -must- pleat the
> corners or the skirt will dump. Hint, the pleats -must- be vertical with
> respect to the running board/ground reference frame.
> 
> If you're making a tubular skirt then you want to make it in eight (8)
> seperate sections. Four (4) straight tubular pieces, use a wood dowel
> or a similar form to make. Then the four (4) corner pieces.
> 
> 
>  --
>     ____________________________________________________________________
> 
>     We don't see things as they are,                      ravage@ssz.com
>     we see them as we are.                                   www.ssz.com
>                                                   jchoate@open-forge.org
>     Anais Nin                                         www.open-forge.org
> 
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) Non-lego motor -- for lower weight and higher RPM. Non-lego skirt -- because there isn't anything in Lego that can do that. Non-lego propellor -- because the Lego ones are crap Non-lego decking -- for lightness and rigidity. ...hmmm it's (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) You'll have to answer that for yourself. A lot of what I find fun would probably bore/scare most to death. For example, I find all these transformers and such that a lot of Mindstorm folks rave over completely and utterly uninteresting, and (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) Bingo. (...) Take a look at some of these micro motors that are being used in the new mini-RC cars. You can buy a whole car kit, radio, and controller for about $75US. (...) A helo tail rotor is your best bet. Wood or a composite is your best (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

32 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR