To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 19626
19625  |  19627
Subject: 
RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:45:33 GMT
Original-From: 
Marco Correia <marco@soporcel.[IHateSpam]pt>
Reply-To: 
<marco@#IHateSpam#soporcel.pt>
Viewed: 
4567 times
  
Hi Rob :)

> A ducted fan approach may work.

Yes, I *think* that's the only way.

> There is also the famous British hovercraft that had a HUGE
> thrust fan in the center of it.

That's my first approach. I'll deal with motion next.

> The duct looks similar to those nuclear plant tower
> hourglass shapes.  Although, this design (in LEGO) would be
> very heavy and the thrust probably wouldn't be enough.

100% LEGO yes, but I'm planning on using LEGO (maybe ZNAP at first, then a
mix of Technic) as the "wire-frame" and then use plastic film to "fill" the
all thing.

mc.

PS: A cool thing would be if LEGO became interested in this, and could build
custom light ducted propellers and/or an electric ducted air turbine...
erm... and then release it as another Mindstorms Expansion or as a complete
(working) Hovercraft Technic set ;)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
A ducted fan approach may work. Ducted fan hovercraft have one or two big fan blades on the back that push the craft forward, but a duct takes some of the air and uses it to fill the skirt. This is probably the "lightest" design approach. Direction (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

32 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR