Subject:
|
Re: IC 4.01 - Legway
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:21:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1210 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Gareth Bestor writes:
> On the subject of IC4.01, does anyone know what the relative performance
> (speed) is between, say, the standard RCX 2.0 firmware, IC4 firmware, and say
> brickOS code? I thought I'd try rewriting Steve's Legway program in IC4 but
> perhaps it really needs the extra speed of native code.
From what I've seen (people running such tests) I believe the standard
firmware requires about 3ms to execute a command, while the BrickOS
'firmware' will execute around 33 commands/ms (about 100 times faster).
I also want to try re-writing the LegWay code for NQC, but I'm not sure if
it will respond fast enough.
Steve
http://perso.freelug.org/legway/LegWay.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IC 4.01 - Legway
|
| (...) Speaking of re-writing the LegWay code, I am getting very close to completing my Pascal translation of the brickOS headers. I re-wrote the LegWay code in Pascal and it compiles but there are still a few problems to be worked out. I've got the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IC 4.01
|
| On the subject of IC4.01, does anyone know what the relative performance (speed) is between, say, the standard RCX 2.0 firmware, IC4 firmware, and say brickOS code? I thought I'd try rewriting Steve's Legway program in IC4 but perhaps it really (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
